| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Briefly summarize the patient case study you were assigned, including each of the three decisions you took for the patient presented. Be specific. | 20 to >17.8 pts Excellent The response accurately and thoroughly summarizes in detail the patient case study assigned, including specific and complete details on each of the three decisions made for the patient presented. 17.8 to >15.8 pts Good The response accurately summarizes the patient case study assigned, including details on each of the three decisions made for the patient presented. 15.8 to >13.8 pts Fair The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the patient case study assigned, including details on each of the three decisions made for the patient presented. 13.8 to >0 pts Poor The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the patient case study assigned, including details on each of the three decisions made for the patient presented, or is missing. |
20 pts | |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Based on the decisions you recommended for the patient case study, explain whether you believe the decisions provided were supported by the evidence-based literature. Be specific and provide examples. Be sure to support your response with evidence and references from outside resources. | 25 to >22.25 pts Excellent The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail how the decisions recommended for the patient case study are supported by the evidence-based literature. … The response includes specific and relevant outside reference examples that fully support the explanation provided. 22.25 to >19.75 pts Good The response accurately explains how the decisions recommended for the patient case study are supported by the evidence-based literature. … The response includes relevant outside reference examples that lend support for the explanation provided that are accurate. 19.75 to >17.25 pts Fair The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how the decisions recommended for the patient case study are supported by the evidence-based literature. … The response includes inaccurate or vague outside reference examples that may or may not lend support for the explanation provided or are misaligned to the explanation provided. 17.25 to >0 pts Poor The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how the decisions recommended for the patient case study are supported by the evidence-based literature, or is missing. … The response includes inaccurate and vague outside reference examples that do not lend support for the explanation provided, or is missing. |
25 pts | |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWhat were you hoping to achieve with the decisions you recommended for the patient case study you were assigned? Support your response with evidence and references from outside resources. | 20 to >17.8 pts Excellent The response accurately and thorough explains in detail what they were hoping to achieve with the decisions recommend for the patient case study assigned. … The response includes specific and relevant outside reference examples that fully support the explanation provided. 17.8 to >15.8 pts Good The response accurately explains what they were hoping to achieve with the decisions recommended for the patient case study assigned. … The response includes relevant outside reference examples that lend support for the explanation provided that are accurate. 15.8 to >13.8 pts Fair The response inaccurately or vaguely explains what they were hoping to achieve with the decisions recommended for the patient case study assigned. … The response includes inaccurate or vague outside reference examples that may or may not lend support for the explanation provided or are misaligned to the explanation provided. 13.8 to >0 pts Poor The response inaccurately and vaguely explains what they were hoping to achieve with the decisions recommended for the patient case study assigned, or is missing. … The response includes inaccurate and vague outside reference examples that do not lend support for the explanation provided, or is missing. |
20 pts | |
This criterion is li
Online class and exam helpStruggling with online classes or exams? Get expert help to ace your coursework, assignments, and tests stress-free! |